06 · Compare
Multi-account and portfolio reviews
A consistent physical lens helps an agency compare multiple accounts or locations.
Best when
The agency needs to prioritize where deeper account research may be most useful.
Example industries
Agency books · Multi-location operators · Program portfolios · Commercial account teams
Operating anatomy
Follow the physical system.
| How value is physically created | Comparable account screens reveal recurring physical dependencies, concentration patterns, and evidence gaps. |
|---|---|
| Critical sites | Account locations · Regional clusters · Shared infrastructure · Shared suppliers |
| Machinery | Account-specific critical equipment · Recurring equipment categories |
| Utilities | Shared grids · Water systems · Fuel corridors · Regional infrastructure |
| Inputs and materials | Common materials · Shared vendors · Concentrated commodities |
| Suppliers | Shared suppliers · Regional distributors · Common service providers |
| Storage | Regional warehouses · Shared cold chain · Concentrated inventory nodes |
| Transportation | Shared ports · Road corridors · Rail networks · Regional carriers |
| Customer channels | Shared markets · Regional demand · Common customer segments |
Interruption pathways
- Geographic concentration
- Supplier concentration
- Infrastructure overlap
- Repeated evidence gaps
What Mandjet may review
- Consistency
- Concentration
- Screening priority
- Common questions
- Escalation criteria
Producer questions
- Which accounts share the same physical dependency?
- Where is evidence weakest?
- Which accounts warrant deeper review first?
- What changed since the last screen?
Example Mandjet output
A screen built around the operating model.
A comparable set of account screens with shared dependency themes and a documented basis for deeper review.
Ready to see Mandjet in action?
Start with a pilot or send one example account. Mandjet will show how the workflow fits your agency.